Here is the basis for YOUR
Analysis
Based on your Answers you are open
for...
Improving Knowledge Work
Proper,
lifefulfilling Knowledge Work
deal with the facts of appearances in
terms of the insights to understanding
the relevant entities in their nature (physics)
or their stance (real human systems).
Here are the relevant Q1-8 Knowledge
Work Qualities that can be
deduced from your answers to the
key questions of
life:
Q1: Project Management in economy
with forthcoming thesis - belief
Q2: Innovation with
antithesis reaching beyond
tradition - breakthrough
Q3: Operationalization based on
an ideal synthesis - path
Q4: Leadership based on a philosophy
about consequences -truth
Q5: Other-Determination by politics and
customer orientation - live
Q6: Self-Determination with own
intellect and its controlling - hope
Q7: Sensibility implemented with a
method and an early warning
system - order
Q8: Identity in using technology and
coping with necessities - reality check
Pleas consult now the list of
ACTUAL values (Q1-8), and the
q1-2 DESIRABLE ones you have
been given based on your answers, in
order to apply the following example to
your case:
Example
|
You have received a list as follows for
your Q1-8 / q1-8:
|
Knowledge
Work Qualities in % |
Q1 |
q1 |
Q2 |
q2 |
Q3 |
q3 |
Q4 |
q4 |
Q5 |
q5 |
Q6 |
q6 |
Q7 |
q7 |
Q8 |
q8 |
-11 |
6 |
-13 |
36 |
-23 |
36 |
-22 |
27 |
5 |
25 |
7 |
13 |
-11 |
13 |
-12 |
4 |
|
What do
the values mean in the above example?
Red, negative
number indicate an inhibition to
the respective quality,
blue, positive
ones, switched on potential. The
numbers indicate the percentage of your
full potential for the respective,
actual Q1-8, or desirable q1-8
quality. Please consider that the sum of
Q1-8 is maximal 200% (not 100% since
the required potentials overlap).
Experienced potential to be
freed/frozen
in
going actual to desired,
potentially from
Option I to
Option II
or vice versa
for Q>q1-8:
Specifically
this example shows a clear
inclination to improve; all q1-8 are
bigger that the respective Q1-8. The
actual situation (Q1-8) is seen all
negative except for dealing with other-
(Q5), and self-determination (Q5). The
way leadership (Q4) is
implemented (Q4) looks pretty grim
with over 20% of human resources wasted
on negative power games. No wonder in
the era of non-trust and with the
hype of mess-management! Please
consider this scenario and put yourself
in the show of the person for whom that
analysis applies. Then consider the
relevant numbers for you.
Another example:
The potential for
the growth perceived by this person lies
in Q4,5, the leadership of others,
say as a film director -
at the cost of
reducing Q6-self-determination
with a low sensibility for the identity
of those involved - above all self, in
order to become mass-attractive for
that is what a film needs to be:
Possible
Relevance and Application of this
Analysis
The
relevance of this analysis method has
been demonstrated back in 1994 on
large scale application at the "Qualifikation
94", an exhibition for
way to qualify in the job market, in Hannover (Germany). It
has proven its significance for
individual and team analysis, for
consulting and workshops. It
deals in absolutes, not in validated Bm-pseudo
science terms based on opinions in the
spirit of the time. Also it is a test,
that can hardly be faked, for the
relationship between the answers to its
questions, and the results of the analysis is to complicated
to do guess work in a desired direction. Also there are
no normal, right, or wrong answers; their
relevance depends on the scenario and
the state of mind of the person
revealing them. And the analysis models
the actual situation as perceived, and
the desirable direction, in a realistic
way in Option II terms. It models not
only the situation but also the mindset
of those who move it with their answers
to the key questions of life.
And by the
way, taping this way into the
mind of those involved in a project,
rather than using so-called objective
data acquired by external consultants in
their frame of mind with their hidden
agendas,
provides a far better basis for an
efficient and in its usage effective
analysis - provided Option II
mindsets are allowed to make use
of it. Who knows the really relevant
facts about a situation better than
those in it? And based on what should
their situation be improved if not for
their personal growth for which they are
truly open? Compare that approach to
a highly expensive, say a McKinsey type
analysis in former East Germany after
the fall of the wall; its result was
that the company should go bankrupt and
its last cash should be paid for the
study that revealed this...
Please respond to the Email sent you,
report your conclusion so that I can
direct you to the analysis of you Option
I mindset which has so far basically
manifested itself in your Q1-8 values
and what they mean in your life. |