[2,0]-Transparency about Generalities - Denotation

In the prevailing Option I world, the statements of T-authorities are accepted without questions, or else, you hit the firewall. This eventually makes authorities more eminent at the expense of the basis they might have once had. Just look at the buzz words they use; they once had a meaning in relation to what they pointed to. But in the end, they are like paper baskets where everyone throws his or her opinion in. Before anarchy takes over, some eminent authority then states the prevailing meaning, linguists call it "denotation". This process goes back to man's first awareness supposedly in Africa standing on a hill in a flat plane, looking around. The sight reveals that he can see about the same distance in all directions. "Why?" he might have exclaimed to himself? Having leadership aspirations, he might have concluded: "I must be at the very center of the universe - the biggest school and even bigger!" With this lesson he might have felt superior over his people and thus qualified to lead them. For that purpose his awe and wonder had to be cultivated by his tribe, of course under his guidance as its source. And so the prototype of the Bm-cult of following the inherent dynamic of multiplying (m) boundary conditions (B) was born. As to the chief himself, wherever he went, he found he was still at the center of things. In his one-track-mind towards leadership, there could be only one conclusion. "Because I am always at the center of things, I must be the most important person around and thus qualified to be the leader!" Still later, based on such prejudices in a way which was then called "reason", follows another realization: "Those who are with me, and are therefore a part of me-and-mine, are also at the center of things and share my importance. Those who are not with me, and not a part of me-and-mine, are not at the center of things, and are therefore of an inferior nature!"

And so, having never allowed questioning of this Option I value, the bulk of man's philosophy, religion, politics, social values, and too often even the management of scientific conclusions, are still based upon this egocentric notion of man being the subject here to play with objects according to his free will. That has become of unquestioned supreme importance with the rightness about me-and-mine at the center of things. But it is of course always opposed by those who were not a part of 'me-and-mine', those on the outside, considered therefore as being inferior by the inner circle.

And that hierarchical "Flat Earth Society" ignores two other men; Moses who received God's laws on Mount Sinai, and Jesus Christ, God's Son, who was crucified by the Romans on Mount Golgotha at the request of scribes, whose intellectual successors are now globally 'crucifying' Earth. Such ignorance of Option II was led ad absurdum throughout all history, from the Old Testament Jewish story to the World Wars in the last century, and now with suicide terrorists in playing the ultimate subject-object game under Option I. You see, in the Option I world, war is indeed the father of all things. It allows the general staff to T-rule the army's formation, and to build T-fortresses, the artillery to g-fire at the enemy at long distance, now operating cruise missiles with a joy-stick, and the infantry to engage in p-close combat. Even t-people have a role beyond the battlefield as go-betweens negotiators up to spies. There are still times and places on Earth where everything else becomes a means to such disgusting ends with nobody recognizing each other in their genuine interests...

In the Option I world (check to understand the color scheme and the sciences#1,2,0,3 and their interactions [s1,s2]) self-, or mass-appointed masters#2 rule the mainstream appearance#0, the intellectuals the underlying spin with denotations. The results are scenes towards chaos. And that is how the Option I world is set up from top to bottom, ultimately against personally relevant insights#3! Thus people who are not crushed by the Bm-spirit, ultimately g-disagree with such so-called eminent authorities. It begins, for all sorts of reasons by putting personal meanings, so-called connotations into the words used. On the other hand a turkey minded person, a Bm-socially conditioned "norm" competing for attractivity ends up with a denotation bound intellect. He is pinned down within a fence of the Bm-mass-attractivity in his target group. He has no trouble with arguing about high fences in politics; just like a turkey, he backs up, takes off, and flies over it into the intellectual software about opinions. But pin a turkey with a low fence; it won't fly over it. It seems in fact as if it knows how to fly over a high obstruction, but can't  figure it out for a low one. Sometimes a turkey flutters up against a low fence, or tries to push it over, but most of the time it just walks around and around in the yard looking for an opening. And that is what our mentally impoverished intellectuals do in view of the low fence between their Bm-conditioned denotations and their inner urge to use connotation to express their conscience. A turkey in the woods, in its natural habitat, when it comes up against a fallen log, it probably reacts as if it takes more effort to lift its heavy bodies in flight over the low barrier than to walk around the it. According to intellectual interpretation, this weird behavior has became the fixed pattern of walking around the low fence. And that as if the turkey had no memory which would allow it to realize that the fence is closed. However, the intellectuals in their ivory towers, politicians in their palaces shielded of from the lives of real people, build at the expense of those they sell short, the people, behave similarly.

[0,3]-Personal Relevance - Connotation

Since all such 02-knowledge work does not only seem awfully stupid in itself, but is disastrous in the long run in view of a little low fence separating us from all that blue sky of possibilities#0 to fulfill#3 life above and outside the fence! And we are told, it cannot be figure out! That's what's happening to us under Option I! The spirit of our time always argues that any kind of intelligence to arise in the universe would have to be like the Bm-norm set up by Antique Philosophers with no clue about what modern science has revealed about nature, and personal insights about lifefulfillment in the last two thousand years.

The spirit of the time argues that whatever thing, topic, in its evolutionary physical shape, or any entity and being is not so important as its mentally Bm-evolved ideas about it. Everyone would have to follow the corresponding political correctness for his or her own good. We should all be the same, because the spirit of the time is supposed to be our Bm-common denominator.

Now the signs are on all the walls of the temples of idolatry, of churches, universities, governments, and corporate palaces that we are wrong in setting up and managing our knowledge work as if human systems would not matter in their created essence! Our concept of science is too narrow; it excludes real human systems so that in regards to them even to ourselves, we are like a turkey in view of a low fence. This ignorance even leads to ignoring the known laws of nature when it comes to ecology. What did communism do in the end; what has Israel done, what do we all do? We lock ourselves in, behind words darkly, and deed out of hidden agendas. We have become so fixed in our pattern of managing the symptoms instead of solving the underlying problem based on the relevant causes and substantialities. And so we see everything only in its appearance from the Bm-mainstream's point of view hidden behind words darkly rather than as it really is, impacts, and what it, you and me, better try to fulfill.

So this ultimate provocation asks people who have still have eyes to see, and ears to hear with brains between the ears sep up by reason, for a proper science accounting for what is personally relevant, instead of "anything goes". In short the t-science, directed at extrapolating the arty-farty co-ordinate system#0 beyond the denotational, personal-neutral one#2 of the mainstream to first consider the human systems involved with Applied Personal Science#3, and, turning in a personally relevant way to the science of nature#1 for technology. Otherwise science ends up in category errors such as dealing live as a biochemical process conditioned by society for an "anything goes" subject playing with all kinds of objects, topics, and ideas. And with it, mainstream science looks at the actually low fence of 03-understanding real people, in its category errors confused, claiming humans are a too complex impossibility. This is how a turkey deals with a log, too lazy to fly over it, rather parading and showing off. And so intellectuals proudly declare themselves as not being able to understand what human individual life is about. In fact that is a mere pretext to go on dividing and ruling by fencing, in the business as usual way. The intellectuals pretend to be eminent eagles, and yet they all end up as hot air in the pot of the spirit of the time, or in the pipe it smokes as a soul smothering Moloch.

[3,1]-Reframing

From the above it becomes clear, that the [2,0]-transparency interaction needs to be overcome by [0,3]-personal understanding, and that requires the kind of [3,1]-reframing we are talking about to be more than hot air. Ultimately human life is individuals, reframing its Option I interpretation to its Option II fulfillment. It begins with t-asking questions like: "What if the underlying options we have chosen as paradigms, ideologies, and policies, are wrong, inhibiting lifefulfillment, even finally leading to the very destruction of our living space Earth?"

You are here, because you are in the process of reframing your mindset. You should know by now, that there is no general recipe for living your life. After all your life is entirely yours and not a personally-neutral#2 thing! And so fulfilling it cannot be left to technology such as biochemically with a pills, or with genetic or neuronal manipulation#1, or simply magically#0 manifesting wishes at will, say with "neuronal language programming", mass-psychosis, hypnosis, or any more or less secret, mystical, or mass-attractive inter-disciplinary brew and so on and so forth. The knowledge work that leads to lifefulfillment requires YOU fulfilling your substance given to you!

[1,2]-Serving Lifefulfillment

Under Option I, people pretend to serve#1 others in p-fragments within the Bm-bounds of personally neutral T-organizations#2, which by their very principle despise real people when they become aware#3 of their real selves and try to come forth with fulfilling it. Thus we serve each other with word darkly organized death technology for at best an embellished death of an unfulfilled life. And that in order for organized collectives to survive; by thriving even on our death. Where does people's money, where do all their memories, insights and experience, even if stored on their PC, or the internet go when they get too old to fulfill anything with it under Option I? Earth to earth, ashes to ashes, nothing to be understood in life or in death that is the mantra of the spirit of the time and its scribes...

To overcome this ultimate Nihilism of Option I with Option II requires the [1,2]-service interaction on, and for Life-Fulfilling Platforms as the focus, aim, and goal of all desirable knowledge work. And that general focus#2 is ultimately the only one worth being implemented with man-made forms#0 in the 20-03-31-12-20... progression of knowledge work as described here. We call it t-science. It overcomes the prevailing Option I on the basis of which the so far organized science collapses the 16 dimensions of social interaction to Bm with 12 [X#,Bm#] out of 16 possible [m1#,m2#] interactions. Option II overcomes this otherwise self-destructive thinking catastrophe before the point of NO return to a human catastrope. Its 4 possible t-interactions [m1#,m2#] (2,0 - 0,3 - 3,1 -1,2) allow for progressing in the only meaningfully sustainable and desirable direction, that of lifefulfillment for as many real human beings as possible. Unlike Bm-science incorporated and its scribes & Co. Limited pretending to be good for people while provoking suppression and bad "accidents", those who have understood to apply science#3 are not afraid of [2,0]-transparency; they grow in its light as outlined here towards [0,3]-personal understanding what need to be [3,1]-reframend for proper [1,2]-services...

That all makes perfect sense, but it so far largely inhibited to be recognized under Option I - so what is your conclusion in view of its firewall of which the form Iron Curtain was just small fence for a turkey, or a playpen for kiddies...

[Your Path from Option I to Option II]
[Signs] [Stress] [Firewall] [Religion] [Leading Edge] [Affiliate] [Feedback]