Option I is mass-attractive, Option II
necessary for life-fulfillment...
The Others are no desirable
Measure Stick!
Motivation under Option I and Option II
This site was written in response to
increasing
campaigning to move people in the
spirit of the time,
and to the attempts for a New World
order by heavyweights, such as investors Berggruen,
Soros, Sawiri, and the
WEF-gurus
in search of common norms for their new
reality while US-President Obama tries a
new motivation for the nation - all
final desperate attempts to save Option
I as will be outlined here...
It explains recent scientific results
on what motivates us effectively as
far as the publically organized (Option
I) science allows,
1) for %-mass-attractively
regulated tasks; in this world,
the effective motivators are in terms of
content-free
financial incentives. However,
most people are dropped by the financial
system. And so
Mohamed Bouazizi, a Tunisian a jobless
university graduate, who as a fruit
vendor trying to care for his family,
was deprived of his earning by the
corrupt police. And so he
burnt himself in
public view
to trigger a revolution
against Tunisia's' dictator Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali
and his
platform for all sort of so-called
leaders. In short, self-destructive
humans trigger the
destruction of self-destructively set-up
mass-attractive collectives. Tunisia
could thus become
the spark that sets up Middle East rough
states in flames - Bouazizi left
alone a family forgotten by the media western world,
which simply
wishes for a renewed political magic,
big business still relaxing in its
framework which allows easy rip-offs for
those in control of the money system up
to waging another war (Israel-Iran) in
business as usual - may-be this time,
one to many...
2) and beyond, for
complex tasks that require creativity,
the motivators
are the following opportunities for
task-fulfillment...
2.1) ... in
autonomy of
%1-political
correctness! This explains the reversal
of the effect of mere financial
incentives to the degree that it defies
the Option I the world provides us with its
theory X about what humans are supposed
to be. Thereby the behavioral
theory of economy and also politics is
shown to be false where it really
matters. More specifically, this
proves that a real human being is in
essence of his or her substance, open beyond any
other-determinedness, up to Jesus
Christ’s resurrection and his L3-impact on
human history.
For this purpose each human being
has the
§1-right to express his or her
life
even if its expression is not mass-attractive in terms of what communicates in a
mass-attractive ways. Under Option I people are forced to have their §1-state of being
corrupted to the zeitgeist! Typically you are §1-shut up with reference to
the desired effect NOT YOU, but money can have and how that can be secured für
§2-hiddenagendas in
§0-sustainable ways to which you should have fake §3-integrity...
2.2) ... which require some
mastery
corresponding to one’s potential!
This
proves that a real human being is ended, e.g. purpose
driven along "a red thread"
in the sense, that he or she is
intrinsically urged to
fulfill a
personally relevant task. Thereby each
human being has a
§2-right to pursue his
or her purpose of life.
However, in order to limit people's
§1-expressing their innate §2-purpose, leftwing politics opts for more state
in the name of personally-neutral justice. In order to prevent individuals from
L3-Reframing the collective order in which the rightwing politicians thrive, they opt for
less state, and more market, the content-free political magic to prevent
personal L3-relevance, allowing to instrumentalize people's individual
§2-propose for hidden agendas of peer groups, sprinkled with intellectual fairy
dust, pretending to not think of self, but what is good for most. And so, those
who thus "sacrifice" themselves, feel justified to sacrifice whoever is in their
path to success, as the scribes had Jesus nailed to the cross to render him
politically ineffective...
2.3) ... with a
purpose related to
life-fulfillment towards contributing to
a better word, which proves that a real
human being’s life is
generative
in a way, that can be understood by a principle in the
course of fulfilling his or her respective tasks.
And in
thus growing and following it up with
§3-personal
integrity, a
§0-sustainable way
becomes apparent. This
is necessary so a sufficient number of
real people can succeed in making the world a
better place than under the otherwise
Option I,
mono-politically evolving world of the
%1-political correctness. The
history of world I is seemingly based on
%5-manipulative mutations (rhetoric,
crimes, wars, revolutions which turn the
world to ashes, out of which the phoenix
of %1 resurrecting in the Emperor’s New
Cloth is hoped for as the spirit of the time, the
zeitgeist), and on %6-projecting hidden
agendas trying to defy §1-§2-§3-§0 of
real people.
Under this spell of Option I
people are poorly motivated to perform
beyond theory X, but in return they
*3-provoke
social risks to defy the %-systems which
intimidates them in trying to instrumentalize their purpose of life,
ultimately all life on the planet itself.
Hellas, the ideal systems is not the most mass-attractive one. And so the ingredient
for political magic is presented as the the solution for the problem it
is itself! Having opted for that path at the leading edge since
the going to the Wild West, almost everybody in California, including the
former Hollywood "Terminator" Arnold Schwarzenegger, are now unhappy, blaming
each other in a
broken cultural and political system for its failure. Similarly the 16.
US-President Abraham Lincoln had to ultimately wage the American Civil War
and, then blamed for its terrible outcome, was murdered after most of the
wounded people made peace and completed it with his glorifying funeral...
2.4) In other words, real human beings
ultimately strive for Option II,
in a personally relevant way,
corresponding to the
open-ended generative
principle
that does justice to his or her innate
life-through task-fulfillment! With its
onset of §1-§2-§3-§0 people aim in their
B1-belief towards a B2-breaking through
Option I towards Option II, leading on
to a
worthwhile B3-path, which in B4-truth
leads to B5-life-fulfillment.
Therefore the answer is not delivering a
"better" constitution to the people,
e.g. a mass attractive way to succumb
them to Option I, but to incorporate the
understanding of real people in the
Constitution to allow reframing society a as
LifeFulfilling Platform
under Option
II as follows:
2.5) Only such a
lifefulfillingly genuine life
experience leads one to a justified H1-hope for an
H2-order, beyond the worldly one under
Option I, which allows us to H3-relate to
tangible reality in such a way, that it leads to an H4-understanding of the underlying order
that is not at man’s disposition; the
corresponding laws by which reality
changes, ranging from the laws of nature, up to
the one that
govern a real human being’s life,
thus provide the best available
role models for an H2-based in H4 Option II world.
In other words, not say "California" is worth saving, but
the mutual understanding of real people is
worth promoting and being challenged beyond Option I
based collectives, even of the so-called exemplary democracy of Switzerland!
Democracy as such is simply a medium term more mass-attractive version of
Option I than short-term "benevolent" dictatorships...
2.6) Naturally H4 is the necessary
condition for any L1-loving engagement, which
when fruitful say through a conception /
conceptualizing a project, requires a
sufficientL2-timely
exchange of
project-oriented competence
(think what
is required during a pregnancy), contrary
to simple "best practices" in Option I based management. Will
California be the place for the urgently required L3-turnaround from
Option I to Option II? It has bred a sense of crises AND a
receptiveness to change, and has a constitution that allows change
through popular vote. Or will it be Switzerland with similar
conditions? Anyway this issue is too serious to leave it to politicians
just greedily riding the mass-attractive zeitgeist as the worthwhile spirit
of the time for their hidden agendas. The final turnaround needs to happen by a
sufficient number of real people §1-expressing
themselves genuionely - a frightful concept for Option I
left-wing intellectuals and those
infected by them! Against it, they rather allow life on Earth to come
to an end. And those on the right-wing
side with the a view that sees the real world and in it capitalism as a game,
the aim is to use its functions as a platform for business, and where
its has failed at the flaws in the systems -
searching for another magic as a
solution to the problem it is, rather than allowing people's L3-state of being!
And so they resort to promoting radical fiscal measures to tackle ballooning
debts say in the bold initiative to change the way western politics and
government run, say in the "Think
Long Committee for California" headed by the homeless billionaire Nicolas
Berggruen with
former protagonists and heavyweights such as Condolezza Rice, former shadow of
George W. Bush, or at the annual
WEF in
Davos Switzerland...
2.7) When the
L2-tepoc-requirements reach undue limits by
creeping around Option I mass-attractively
multiplied boundary conditions, a
L3-reframing to sufficiently restore
Option II is mandatory! Otherwise
tragedy evolves “in front of the door of heaven”,
where according to the Bible, the Option
I obsessed scribes / intellectuals
supposedly lead people to, and then block
them from a turnaround to Option II at any
price!
In fact L3, as above mentioned §1, is not mass-attractive in terms of what communicates in a mass-attractive ways.
Under Option I people
are forced to sacrifice in addition to the elementary §1-state of being, also
their highest L3-state of being to the zeitgeist!
Consider Jesus Christ’s life and you
find all these seven steps perfectly
manifested. In John 14:12 Jesus challenges
real people to follow him, do likewise
and beyond; loving God and fellows like
oneself – not making them alike by
dividing them (disposing the essential,
leaving the non-essential as the least
common denominator and convincing the
target group of this Option I – today using
up-to-date technology on all levels from drugs to social media) in order to
rule them!
2.8) To take this serious
means putting an end to all bonus programs for top managers who suggest they
need it to
solve complex problems better. It is a fact, that for tasks that
require highly skilled people and creativity, only a clear purpose and a vision with a goal of making the world a better place leads to sustainably
desirable results. In essence that means working for setting up LifeFulfilling
Platforms in tune with the participants oegp, supporting and challenging
them, firstly oneself accordingly, towards mastery of one's innate task
fulfillment with H4>L1-true life-fulfilling involvement.
In the end it comes down to
motivating people to fulfill their
innate purpose of life and by doing so,
supporting the purpose of those concerned
- for that is contained in each real human's being uncorrupted by Option I; beyond the limiting
Option I world, in tune with the Option
II based conscience toward! That requires, depending on the topic addressed the open-ended
generative principles (oegp) of the
8 emotional and family roles,
the 9 functions of any human system, the
16 social impact dimensions, the 144
input-internal state options of the 9 functions in the 16 social dimensions, up
to 1728 oegp that also include the output or the call of real human beings. This
contrasts with the mono-political madness of the Option I approach to aim for
ONE way to deal with people about which in effect everybody has another opinion,
the complex web of lies is then boiled down to the ever faster changing zeitgeist, the political correctness and the
correspondingly more or less mass-attractive boundary conditions which are then
attempted to be used to enforce a socially compatible human life style and channel the
money flow from the mass to the "elite" so they can appear in the
Emperor's New Cloth...