[2,0]-So much for Transparency

You - possibly: "I hear what you say, with the greatest respect." - meaning: "I disagree and do not want to discuss it any further, I think you are wrong, even a fool!", or shall I think: "He/She accepts my point of view and is listening to me ready to build on it..."?

In world I transparency is meant to give food for [2,0]-discussions; beware if it leads to 03-understanding! That would mean the end of free opinion and democracy, the highest value under Option I, short of demeaning real people as the source of such disgusting behavior! Undue questions and conclusions are against the political correctness of the time, so beware of being caught in that crime; punishment applies against Bm-perpetrators, on the spot, executed by the 78% who agree to disagree with the 22% conditioned to try t-knowledge work!

[0,3]-So much for Personal Relevance

You - possibly: "This is not bad, actually very interesting." - meaning: "That is possibly good, but in its implication for some very bad, and they will backfire, and therefore it is disappointing - so leave me alone with it - you might come back if you have convinced the majority!", or shall I think: "He/She is willing to think and elaborate on it, even up to taking a risk to invest in it..."?

Nobody can do the understanding for you; all the money in the world cannot buy it, and by the way, it is the precondition for love. And you cannot understand what you want to have power over. But how about if others use power against what you have understood? According to the Bible you should offer you left cheek if the have hit you on the right one, but what then? And how can you love such enemies? By really understanding them in their motives; only then can you do something reasonable!

You - possibly: "Am I stupid where I cannot understand?" Me: "How would you call a moth that mixes up a candle with the sun?" You - possibly: "But that is being intolerant!", Me: "What good does that nice sounding comment do, it is actually a put down without knowing better, e.g. real intolerance! What does it do to the moth's sister approaching another candle?" The real difficulty here is the fear that the understanding needed cannot or will not happen in time, and that wastes time...

[3,1]-Reframing

You - possibly: "That is all very well, but I have no time to invest into consideration that do not earn me money now!" - meaning: "I am more afraid of the 'others', than of doing wrong!", or shall I think: "If I let him/her earn enough money, he/she will come back to me to get involved...".

But may be you simply want me to help you get money with what I talk about without you applying any of it. In other words, I should do all the work I have more or less done unpaid since 1979, and help you to get money on top of it now! Then in the end we shall all go down the drain stinking rich like the bankers before the self-inflicted crisis. (this is absolutely not the case here.) But wait, even then such people want stupid people to pay further for them! Isn't that what it is all about in this world? Yes that is what it is under Option I; you just have to have fewer scruples than others to get your share of money and power!

[1,2]-Serving Lifefulfillment

You - possibly: "It is not my fault, that the world is as it is!" - meaning: "It is your fault to rub my nose into Option I and you don't have a chance in hell to get away with it! From that point of view you must be crazy not to rape the people and the planet as long as you can!" Me: "Your are right, NOBODY has a chance in hell, e.g. world I, but I thought I had a chance with you, if not, then you are possibly part of hell, e.g. of the problem, rather than of the solution..." But the stress associated with this typical misunderstandings will not be the last word!

[Your Path from Option I to Option II]
[Nach oben] [Signs] [Stress] [Firewall] [Religion] [Leading Edge] [Affiliate] [Feedback]